- ISBN13: 9781880685426
- Condition: New
- Notes: BRAND NEW FROM PUBLISHER! BUY WITH CONFIDENCE, Over one million books sold! 98% Positive feedback. Compare our books, prices and service to the competition. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed
The first years of the poker boom were fueled by the interest in no-limit hold em tournaments. Recently, however, players have been gravitating to another, even more complex form of hold em no-limit cash games. In Harrington on Cash Games: Volume I, Dan Harrington teaches you the key concepts that drive deep-stack cash game play. You ll learn how to tailor your selection of starting hands to your stack size, how to recognize the increasing deception value of supposedly weaker hands as the stack
Price:
- ISBN13: 9781419680892
- Condition: New
- Notes: BRAND NEW FROM PUBLISHER! 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. Tracking provided on most orders. Buy with Confidence! Millions of books sold!
Beyond statistics, beyond whether to raise, call, or fold, Elements of Poker reveals a new world of profitability for your bankroll and your life. You know tilt costs you money, but do you know how to make it go away? You know position is important, but do you know how to cash in that knowledge? Elements of Poker will teach you all of this and much more. Tommy Angelo is a top tier poker coach, poker writer, and philosopher. Humorous and provocative, Elements of Poker turns conventional poker wis
Price:
Want to rate the book higher…but I can’t,
“Harrington on Cash Games” is a two book series that deals with full ring no limit cash games. Volume I deals with general concepts, preflop play and flop play. Part one of the book begins with basic ideas. Harrington recommends skipping this section if you are already familiar with the fundamentals of no limit hold ‘em and I agree. This section of the book does not cover any new ground. Part two of the book deals with broad elements of no limit cash games. The section on stack size is excellent and explains how different stack sizes call for vastly different preflop and postflop strategy. The section on hand reading is good as Harrington goes through some of the thought processes required to break down and analyze a hand. There’s a very brief discussion of metagame. This involves exploiting your image and making small costly plays which you expect will reap greater dividends in the future.
Part three is about tight aggressive preflop play. This is where the book starts to lose some of its shine. The book is stuck in what is conventionally referred to as “level 1″ thinking, that is “What cards do I hold in my hand?”. Different types of opponents require different strategies but the book plods on with many pages of “I have X hand in Y position. What should I do?”. As a trivial example an opponent who is a “rock” and rarely tries to steal your blind requires a different strategy from a maniac who tries to steal your blind every time it is folded around. The book does not really address tailoring your play to your opponent preflop.
Part four of the book is about tight aggressive flop play. Once again the book falls short in a number of areas. To take an example, if you raise preflop and are out of position, Harrington recommends mainly checking KK on a rainbow K72 flop (that is you hold top set on a board without many draws). What Harrington omits to mention is how you should play your distribution of hands in this spot as part of a balanced strategy. For example if you are checking top set but continuation betting most of your hands that miss, this begins to create an imbalance that an opponent can exploit. All the examples are about “How do I play my hand” and the author does not address the question of “How do I balance my distribution of hands in this spot”.
As in the preflop section, there is very little discussion of opponent type and this is where the book loses the most marks. Discussion of opponent tendencies is extremely limited. A typical example would be “Let’s call 10 percent of the time and fold 90 percent, calling only against the loosest and most aggressive players”. Given that you are supposed to randomize your actions using your wristwatch and that Harrington doesn’t explain how to quantify “loosest and most aggressive players” these guidelines are difficult to follow. There are other quirks and inconsistencies that would be jarring to the astute reader. For example, after calling a bet out of position with 7h6h preflop and then leading out on a TT4 board and getting raised, Harrington recommends calling 10% of the time to “balance our value calls in other situations”. To me this statement is rather obscure and although this volume specifically focuses on preflop and flop play, I feel it is an injustice to leave the reader in this predicament without at least a brief discussion of turn and/or river play. Another inconsistency occurs when at one point Harrington recommends raising with middle pair “to represent top pair” whereas throughout the rest of the text, Harrington recommends mainly calling with top pair. If your strategy is to mainly call with top pair, then it is difficult to try to represent top pair by raising. The last section of the book is tight aggressive play with multiple opponents. This is basically Harrington saying “Don’t bluff, play more cautiously and people usually have what they’re representing”.
The book certainly has moments where it shines. The “problems” sections contains detailed and well thought out analysis. The text will provoke a lot of thought about the game even if there are some specific examples which seem unpolished or unfinished. Novice players will gain a lot from the text. Intermediate players should only expect to pick up a few gems every now and again. As a brief note there are parts of the text that apply to other forms of the game for example short handed online no limit. However these types of games have a lot of specific nuances that the book does not address at all (for example light 3 betting and light 4 betting preflop). Overall I still recommend this book as a buy even though the book seems to treat poker as more of “a card game played with people” rather than “a people game played with cards”.
Was this review helpful to you?
|The quality is a bit uneven here, but still worth the price of admission,
Dan Harrington’s three volumes on no limit tournament strategy became instant classics in the world of poker literature. No one before had ever attempted such a comprehensive discussion of optimal tournament strategy, with unique and extensive hand examples drawn from real-world play. Certainly no one with Dan Harrington’s record and reputation had done so. Now, in this planned two-part series, Harrington tries to tackle cash game play in the same style and manner as his tournament books. In doing so, he has written a good, solid book, but not a great one, and certainly not another classic.
Harrington was destined to fall short tackling this subject matter. To begin with, no limit cash game play has been written about extensively, starting with Doyle Brunson in 1979′s Super System and carrying on through a plethora of Sklansky’s 2+2 books throughout the 1980s and 1990s. Thus, while Harrington was able to discuss several unique and unfamiliar ideas on no limit tournament strategy (including the importance of blind structure, the M number, chip management, inflection points, among many others), there’s not much new ground here to cover. In fact, this book only contains two new “Harrington Laws”, and both of them are lifted from Sklansky (the gap theory of calling an early position raiser and the unimpressive observation that more people in the pot means that a player needs a stronger hand in order to bet).
So basically there’s nothing exactly new here. I agree partially with the review by Don Nguyen below; the book does indeed focus way too much on level 1 thinking (i.e. how strong a hand do I “need” given a particular flop and position). However, to its credit the book does indeed move beyond this level of thinking, at least occasionally, to discuss playing back at loose maniacs with marginal hands or taking advantage of a handful of “prime” bluffing/semi-bluffing opportunities. But mostly, the hand analysis is fairly straight-forward, conservative, and unimaginative in the extreme. Things are even further confused by Harrington’s odd insistence on assigning an exact percentage to whether he would raise, call or fold in a certain situation (sometimes on the order of 80% fold, 15% raise, and 5% call). I understand the need to randomize one’s play, and could see Harrington making a suggestion such as a player should “mostly fold, but consider raising as a bluff against some weak opponents”, but the random percentages thrown out by Harrington seem arbitrary. And who exactly is really going to glance at their watch to determine whether they should perform the 70% call, or the 30% raise? In my mind it’s much better to vary your play to your opponent rather than according to a random number generator.
All in all, this is a good, conservative tome on cash game play that’s comparable to much of what’s out there in the poker literature. However, many readers may remember that Vol. I of Harrington on Hold ‘em Tournament Play was also very by-the-numbers and unimaginative, emphasizing a more or less rigid, tight aggressive strategy. I have high hopes that the next installment on cash game play will feature some of the same level of insightful thinking we saw in Vols. II and III of the Harrington on Hold em series.
I’d also recommend The Poker Tournament Formula and Poker Tips that Pay: Expert Strategy Guide for Winning No Limit Texas Hold em for readers that are looking beyond the Harrington series.
Was this review helpful to you?
|Bridging the gap between tournament and cash game play,
While expectedly falling short of the tournament series which was always going to happen do to cash games being a much more complex topic, these books are perfect for someone wishing to start the transition to cash games from tournaments from a tournament player’s perspective.
I for one have been reasonably successful in tournament play for 2-3 years, but have always struggled with cash game play and could never figure out why. This book was very helpful to me in that it explains WHY the two types are different, and the adjustment in perception that has to be made.
If you are a tournament player this will definitely introduce some ideas that you will not be comfortable with and hands that you have been quite happy to get all in with in a tournament are now hands that are very often beat by the turn and beyond. But if you are open minded and try the concepts introduced here, I think you will see an improvement in your results…As with the previous Harrington books, the hand problems are fascinating and provide a lot of insight…
These books will likely not help the experienced and successful cash game player much, but everyone else should learn a lot. Coupling reading thse books along with Professional No Limit Poker Vol 1 will improve your understanding. Well worthwhile
Was this review helpful to you?
|How to Play Your “A” game More, and Your “C” game Less,
Tommy Angelo is a well known poker teacher/consultant. A good teacher doesn’t drill information into your memory. He teaches you how to think.
I just received my copy yesterday. This book is written from the perspective of how to approach the game of poker in order to play your best more often.
I am familiar with some of the concepts from reading: 1) Tommy’s website, tiltless.com, and 2) other articles previewing the book.
Certainly, his Reciprocality essay on his website is pure gold, and parts of it are repeated in the book. Basically, Reciprocality means money flows when you do something different from the norm. For instance, there is information reciprocality. Many players will show their hands from time to time. This gives away information. If you never show your hand, you win the game of information reciprocality. Over time, money flows to you. There is tilt reciprocality. Many players will tilt from time to time. If you tilt less often and for less duration than the norm, you win the game of tilt reciprocality. Over time, money flows to you.
One of the concepts in the book that I find extemely useful: the way to look at position. Basically, according to Tommy, there are 4 positions outside the blinds: Early Position, Hijack, Cutoff, and Button. He eschews the concept of Middle Position. It’s all Early, until you get to the last 3 seats to act. He then gives you the percentage of hands you should play in each position, ranging from 10% in Early Position to 40% on the Button.
This one concept will help you play your A game, and avoid your C game, at least preflop.
Another concept I found intriguing – breathing. He spends several pages on breathing and meditation and how to remain calm at the table, which of course will help you win the battle of tilt reciprocality.
I look forward to reading the rest of the book. What I have read so far is certainly thought provoking. This book promises to be among the best poker psychhology texts available.
Was this review helpful to you?
|My review from Card Player magazine,
This review was published in Card Player magazine on February 21, 2008:
To discover what we really need in a new poker book, let’s first examine what we really don’t need. A list of starting hands. A reminder that “tight is right.” How to play a flush draw in limit. I could go on.
So what do we need? We need Tommy Angelo’s excellent new book that covers 144 “elements” of poker (the title, no doubt, harks to The Elements of Style by Strunk and White). We need to develop our own selection of starting hands, by position; he provides a chart. We need to learn to play “mum poker,” which “is not about not talking. It’s about not talking about certain things, namely, poker things.” We need to learn about “the path of leak resistance” (say, avoiding the pits: “When a poker player plugs the leak, or tries to, he walks the path of leak resistance”). We even need to learn how to fold: not what to fold, but how to fold: you “fastfold” when “you muck your hand as soon as you know you are beat” because (a) it’s courteous and (b) it reduces your information outflow.
“Fastfold” is one of the many words and terms Angelo has coined (and his great verbal dexterity makes the book a pleasure to read; lively, entertaining, and interesting as well as instructive). He credits himself with the creation of the word “hijack” for the seat one to the right of the cutoff (because a raised from that seat “hijacked” Angelo from the button). Another one I particularly relished was “bliscipline,” a combination of bliss and discipline: “when you are at the table and you are so totally in control of yourself and so totally at peace in the situation that no matter what happens next, you’ll still have plenty of resolve in reserve.”
“Bliscipline” is what you need to survive and win at poker; bliscipline is what you need to achieve–another Angelo-ism–”tiltlessness.” While I still believe the definite work on tilt is Zen the Art of Poker by Larry Phillips (see my review in Card Player, April 25, 2007), Angelo is the new poet of tilt, which he defines as “any deviation from your A-game and your A-mindset, however slight or fleeting.” Everybody tilts; “To make money from tilt, you don’t need to be tiltless. But you do have to tilt less.”
Tilt less; win more. How? “To win at poker, you have to be very good at losing.” And that requires practice. Learn to become “hopeless” (“if I am hopeful that I will win, it is inevitable that I will sometimes be disappointed”). Recognize that poker is the “mother fluctuater” (which is “why it’s best to not give a fluc”). Understand that the “gray area”–that huge swath of poker where you simply don’t know what to do–is just another part of the game. Do not “resist reality”: “Extreme resistance is extreme pain.”
And we need to learn how to breathe (i.e., mindfully: “to elevate your calmness”). It sounds like New Age claptrap, but Angelo has made me a believer in the power of controlled, conscious breathing, which helps you step away from bad beats and losses: “By eliminating the past, and eliminating the future, we give ourselves this present.” Very Zen, but, I think, very true–and very helpful (if you put it to work).
Elements of Poker does offer some traditional strategic on limit, no-limit, and tournament poker. Angelo is eloquently persuasive, for example, about the supreme importance of position, and there’s a good section on the “dollar value” of your stack/position in tournament poker. But read this book for its understanding of the more subtle “elements of poker.” Then read it again.
Was this review helpful to you?
|